Skip to content

Which programme should I choose?

Updated October 2026 · 2 min read

Start with the route

  • 1-Step programmes have one evaluation target. Their maximum loss changes from static in evaluation to trailing in the simulated funded stage.
  • 2-Step programmes have two targets and keep a static maximum-loss floor in the simulated funded stage.
  • 3-Step has three evaluation targets and also keeps a static simulated funded floor.
  • Instant starts without an evaluation. It has lower leverage, a shorter minimum hold and stricter qualifying-day conditions.
  • Pay After Pass starts with an entry payment, then a remaining fee after passing. Its simulated funded limits are stricter than its evaluation limits.

Standard and Pro are different trade-offs

Pro lowers the first evaluation target, tightens maximum loss and requires fewer qualifying days. 1-Step Pro also has a lower daily-loss allowance than 1-Step Standard. Standard and Pro both have no consistency rule at any stage; that does not remove qualifying days.

The homepage starts on 2-Step Standard, but that default is not a recommendation for every strategy. Use the comparison page to review the stages and your chosen size.

Check the conditions that affect your strategy

Consider whether you carry open trades across the daily reset, how much room your approach needs below a trailing high, and whether your positions can meet the minimum hold. A fee or profit target alone cannot answer those questions.

Was this helpful?

Keep reading

STILL STUCK?

Need a clear answer?

Contact support with the question and your account ID, if you have one. Never send your password.

Email support